
Rating: 5/5 Hallways
Communication theorist Marshall McLuhan said, āthe medium is the message,ā i.e., the format of a message may be as important as the content of said message. No book exemplifies this concept more thanĀ House of LeavesĀ by Mark Z. Danielewski. Despite the popularity of this book, it has yet to be made into an eBook; given that its text is sometimes backwards, upside down, and sideways,Ā House of LeavesĀ can only be a physical book. (And thereās absolutely no possible way it could be adapted for film.)
House of LeavesĀ is a book put together by a young man named Johnny, who is compiling writing by a recently deceased man named Zampanó. Zampanóās writing about a film calledĀ The Navidson Record, which doesnāt exist in the real world or in the world ofĀ House of Leaves.Ā The Navidson RecordĀ follows a family who moves into a house that seemingly doesnāt make sense: Its interior dimensions are larger than its exterior dimensions. The house shifts unpredictably and dangerously, leaving the family and the homeās inhabitants in peril.
This plot is deliberately convoluted and mazelike. The twists, turns, and immersive nature of the book mirror the labyrinth of the house. At times, Johnny will interruptĀ Zampanóās writing with a several-page-long footnote about something heās going through in his personal life. Readers see Johnnyās mental health deteriorate as the book progresses. He becomes so immersed in Zampanóās writing andĀ The Navidson RecordĀ that his life falls apart. The way he gets sucked into Zampanóās writing is the way readers will get sucked into Johnnyās writing. Likewise, readers will get sucked intoĀ The Navidson RecordĀ and all the criticism and literature around it, and theyāll forget it isnāt even a real film in the world ofĀ House of Leaves. Danielewski brilliantly has readers mirror the plot of the book as they readĀ House of Leaves.Ā
House of LeavesĀ is a captivating book full of twists and turns. (Literally. At times, youāll have to hold the book sideways or upside down to read it.) It reads like a work of nonfiction as it has numerous endnotes, exhibits, and appendices. While parts of it may be boring, with lengthy asides about architecture, Morse code, and labyrinths throughout history, stick with it; there is a lot of information thrown out there, but it all has a purpose and will eventually pay off.
House of LeavesĀ is one-of-a-kind and exceptionally creative. It forces readers to ask why we have to read books in a certain orientation and if they have to be read in the same order in which they are paginated. (Questions that Iāve honestly never asked.) It embodies what can happen if artists choose not to allow a medium to hold them back. For that alone, itās a 5/5 for originality. But the plot and symbolism of the house (Is the house a representation of the self? Does the house represent introspection? Does the house bring out a personās true nature? Is there a punishment for those who try to āconquerā the house?) make it a phenomenal read as well. Anyone interested in reading something experimental or out there must readĀ House of Leaves.Ā